Warning: Undefined array key "id" in /srv/www/uat.g77.org/wp-content/plugins/insert-headers-and-footers/includes/class-wpcode-snippet-execute.php(277) : eval()'d code on line 2

Co-facilitators

1. I have the honour to deliver the statement on behalf of the G77 and China.

2. At the outset allow me to express Group’s appreciation for your readiness for engagement and convening us today for the second round of consultations on the modalities resolution for the “Summit of the Future”

3. I would structure my intervention to first share some general comments and concerns and subsequently I will present the Group’s proposals on both preamble and operative section of the resolution.

General Comments:

Co-facilitators

4. First, the Group of 77 and China is of the view that appropriate time must be allowed to consult and negotiate within the Group as well as for seeking instructions from the capital.

5. Today’s informal consultations are convened in less than 48 hours of the release of revised draft, which did not provide sufficient time to consult and seek instructions from the capital.

6. It is Group’s considered opinion that the consultations on the draft resolution are being held in an obvious haste, which is unnecessary and cumbersome for the delegations of the G77 and China.

7. Second, the Group is also concerned regarding stakeholders consultations convened by the co-facilitators for the modalities resolution. This is quite unusual and do not have past precedence for any UN meeting. Negotiations on modalities resolutions have been solely under the domain of member states.

8. Third, the revised draft contains new language proposals, which were not part of the compilation text. Therefore, it is assumed that member states did not propose them. So could the co-facilitators clarify why these proposals have been included in the revised text and what are the sources of these proposals? One such example is OP18 of the revised draft.

9. Fourth, it is related to my previous comment. The Group was hoping to negotiate this resolution based on the compilation text. The release of revised draft without knowing the source of a few proposals has created ambiguity on the overall process.

10. Therefore, the Group would request for clarity on how the co-facilitators wish to proceed. The Group would also like to request co-facilitators to clarify the way forward beyond today’s consultations as well.

Preamble Section:

Co-facilitator,

11. On PP1, the Group can go along with the PP as drafted.

12. On PP2, the Group believes that there is a need to strengthen international solidarity and cooperation and the capacity of the United Nations.

13. On PP3, the Group had already previously indicated clearly that the original para of UNGA resolution 76/76, in which the member states welcomed the submission of the Our Common Agenda Report as the basis of further consideration, should not be amended. Hence, we propose an Alt to bring the language in line with UNGA resolution 76/76.

14. On PP4 and PP5, the Group can go along with the Paras as drafted.

15. On PP7, rather than the linkage between the OCA and the 2030 Agenda, the Group believes that several recommendations included in the Secretary General’s report Our Common Agenda can contribute to accelerating the timely implementation and realization of the 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda.

16. On PP8 and PP9, we support the Paragraphs as drafted.

Operative Section:

Co-facilitator,

17. On OP1, we suggest its deletion. There is a lack of clarity on the source of the language.

18. On OP2 regarding the theme of the Summit, we propose that the theme should be ‘Summit of the Future: Accelerating the Implementation of 2030 Agenda for a better tomorrow’

19. On the timing of the Summit, there are multiple high-level events planned in 2023, including the SDG Summit, the High Level meeting on Universal Health Coverage, Global stocktake, and the High Level Dialogue on Financing for Development. Within the High Level Week itself, we have several High Level Meetings, for which we would also have preparatory meetings and negotiations.

20. At this stage, it seems that the preparatory negotiations would necessitate overlap with other events in 2023. Thus, the timing should be accordingly decided, keeping in mind these other processes as well. This would be a particular challenge for the smaller delegations from the G77 and China.

21. The group agrees on the need to keep the momentum and the dynamism that we have seen during the consultations on OCA, while taking into account the adequate participation of all delegations specifically the smaller delegations from G77 and China.

22. The Group while reserving on OP3 stresses the importance of allocating adequate time and resources to all of these events in order to ensure active engagement of all delegations, especially from developing countries to achieve meaningful and inclusive outcomes.

23. It is also important to note that the Summit must ensure inclusivity while leaving no one behind.

24. On OP5, the Group proposes a third option. We propose that the Summit plenary meetings should be preceded by an interactive multi-stakeholder dialogue from 10 AM to 1PM on the day prior to the Summit. This would allow all voices to be heard adequately.

25. On OP6, there is a lack of clarity on the criteria used for recommending and selecting a Youth Representative to speak in the opening segment. Instead, the Group proposes to only have statements by the President of the General Assembly and the Secretary General in the opening segment.

26. The Group also proposes additional details on the opening segment. We propose that the opening segment should be held from 9am and be followed by the Plenary segment until 2:45 and from 3pm to 9pm on the first day. The plenary segment would resume on the second day of the Summit from 9am to 2:45 and from 3pm to 8:30 pm. The closing segment would be on the second day from 8:30 pm to 9pm and shall feature a statement from the President of the General Assembly.

27. On OP7, we encourage representation at the level of Head of State or Government or the highest possible level.

28. On Op 8, 9, and 10 the Group can support the Paras as drafted. However, we also request for clarification on how Explanation of Positions are envisioned to be accommodated in the Summit.

29. On OP 13, the Group proposes to delete the reference to Paragraphs 11 and 12 above, due to logistical issues with regards to the limited time allocated for the Summit.

30. On OP 14 and 14bis, the Group reserves its position due to the lack of time provided to adequately reflect on these new language proposals.

31. On OP15, the Group has already expressed its position previously. The Group believes that the Secretary General has submitted his rich and comprehensive report “Our Common Agenda” and at this stage there is no need for a follow-up or additional report on the same process. We reiterate that there would not be enough time to reflect on any additional or follow-up report after its release next year when the member states would have already started negotiations on the outcome document of the Summit. Hence, we propose the deletion of OP15.

32. On OP 16, the Group stresses the need to conduct open, transparent and inclusive inter-governmental consultations on the preparatory process. The preparatory process must include inter-governmental meetings to determine and subsequently take action on the scope and tracks of the Summit and the process to conclude the Outcome Document as well as inter-governmental negotiations to conclude the Outcome Document.

33. On OP16 bis, its meaning is vague and unclear. Hence we propose its deletion.

34. On OP17, the Group reserves while highlighting the importance of achieving the SDGs and ensuring synergies between the two Summits. However, this should not pre-judge Group’s reservation on timing of convening of the Summit of the Future.

35. On OP18, the Group requests the Secretary General to support the organization of the Summit within existing resources.

36. On OP 19, the Group supports the Para as drafted.

37. On OP 20, the Group stresses the need to adhere to previously agreed language in this regard and request the deletion of the reference to the preparation of the Summit.

38. The G77 and China will submit its written inputs today. We will also share with you dear co-facilitators the text of our statement.

I thank you.

Distinguished Co-facilitators,

1. I have the honour to deliver the statement on behalf of the G77 and China.

2. The Group appreciates the circulation of the draft modalities resolution for the “Summit of the Future”. The submission of the draft resolution is in line with the inputs provided by the Group during the earlier discussions.

3. At the outset allow me to express the reservation of the Group regarding consultations on the modalities resolution being convened during the holiday season as many of the smaller delegations are struggling to engage in the process.

4. The Group believes that the discussions should be adequately spread out to accommodate the concerns of smaller delegations of the G77 and China. These should also account for the parallel processes such as Establishment of the Youth Envoy Office; Elements Paper of the Declaration on Future Generations as well as a few other processes such as BBNJ.

5. The Group would share detailed edits of on specific paras of the modalities resolution according to the deadline provided by the co-facilitators.

6. However, I would like to summarize our inputs here into two sections:

Preamble Section:

7. In PP1, the Group suggests that we should not amend the original para of the UNGA resolution 76/6 in which the member states welcomed the submission of the Our Common Agenda Report as the basis of further consideration.

8. On PP3, the Group believes that there is a need to strengthen international solidarity and cooperation and the capacity of the United Nations.

9. On PP5, we understand that there is indeed a need to work together in achieving the agreed goals and frameworks such as the 2030 agenda and the Paris agreement on climate change; however, this has to be in accordance with the respective national capabilities.

10. The Group also believe that several recommendations included in the Secretary General’s report Our Common Agenda can contribute to accelerating the timely implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals and the realization of the 2030 Agenda and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda.

11. The Group would also like to take note of the summaries of the five thematic consultations convened by the President of the General Assembled in connection with the “Our Common Agenda” Report.

12. As mentioned in the earlier consultations, the Group would reemphasize that the modalities of the Summit of the Future and the preparatory process should be finalized through intergovernmental negotiations.

Operative Segment:

13. On the timing of the Summit, there are multiple high-level events planned in 2023, including the SDG Summit, the High Level meeting on Universal Health Coverage, Global stocktake, and the High Level Dialogue on Financing for Development.

14. At this stage, it seems that the preparatory negotiations would necessitate overlap with other events in 2023. Thus, the timing should be accordingly decided, keeping in mind these other processes as well. This would be a particular challenge for the smaller delegations from the G77 and China.

15. The group agrees on the need to keep the momentum and the dynamism that we have seen during the consultations on OCA, while taking into account the adequate participation of all delegations specifically the smaller delegations from G77 and China.

16. The Group while reserving on OP1 stresses the importance of allocating adequate time and resources to all of these events in order to ensure active engagement of all delegations, especially from developing countries to achieve meaningful and inclusive outcomes

17. The Group will present its substantive inputs in the subsequent rounds of consultations.

18. It is also important to note that the Summit must ensure inclusivity while leaving no one behind.

19. On OP2 the Group reserves its position. This is also connected to the outcome of OP6.

20. The Group requests further elements to be reflected in the text (particularly OP3-OP7) on the exact time frame of segments within the Summit (opening, plenary and closing), which should include details on time limits for national and group statements, and identifying the speakers in the opening and closing segments from the UN system.

21. The Group requests additional details on the themes proposed by the co-facilitators to be discussed during the Summit and reflected in the proposed Outcome Document, while stressing that Member States should have the necessary time and opportunity to discuss and deliberate on those themes during the negotiations on the modalities resolution.

22. The Group further requests clarification on the participation of stakeholders in the Summit as outlined in OP10 and OP11 (i.e. whether a multi-stakeholder panel would be held in parallel or before the Summit).

23. With this the G77 and China reserves on OP3 till 7 and OP 10 and 11.

24. The Group also believes that the Secretary General has submitted his rich and comprehensive report “Our Common Agenda” and at this stage there is no need for a follow-up or additional report on the same process.

25. It is also important to note that there would not be enough time to reflect on any additional or follow-up report after its release next year when the member states would have already started negotiations on the outcome document of the Summit. Therefore, the Group requests the deletion of OP12.

26. On the negotiations process for the outcome document of the Summit of the Future the Group requests the appointment of the co-facilitators as soon as possible.

27. The Group also reserves on OP14 while highlighting that the importance of achieving the SDGs and ensuring synergies between the two Summits. However, this should not pre-judge Group’s reservation on timing of convening of the Summit of the Future.

28. The Group also requests the Secretariat to support the organization of the Summit within existing resources and encourages states and international donors, as well as the private sector, financial institutions, foundations and other donors to support the participation of representatives of developing countries

I thank you

Mr. Secretary General,
President of the General Assembly,
Under-Secretary General Turk,
Excellencies,

1. I have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of the G77 and China.

2. I would like to express the Group’s appreciation to both the Secretary General and the co-facilitators for the update provided on the OCA processes.

3. The Group expects such briefings to take place on a regular basis in order to keep Member States abreast of the several processes related to “Our Common Agenda” Report.

4. On the Summit of the Future, the Group has already expressed its position during the informal consultations held on 28 July 2022. However, I would, however, reiterate the following key points:

i. The way forward for the Summit must be a detailed inter-governmentally negotiated modalities resolution which encompasses the format, date, timeline, participation, scope and objectives, ‘tracks’, preparatory processes or events, and outcome document of the Summit.

ii. Considering the high ambition for the Summit, adequate time must be provided to negotiate both the modalities resolution and the outcome of the Summit – the ‘Pact for the future’ – to ensure consensus. To allow time for consultations by experts, the negotiating sessions should not be held closely together.

iii. The so-called “tracks” for the Summit must be decided through inter-governmental negotiations. Hence, the modalities resolution should contain details on the tracks.

iv. In order for the Summit to achieve a meaningful and inclusive outcome at the Summit, it is essential to ensure the active engagement of all delegations, especially from developing countries, in all of its preparatory processes and events.Overlap with other negotiations, processes and events should be avoided in order to allow for effective participation of smaller delegations.

v. On the timing of the Summit, the Group would like to recall that there are various other high level events scheduled for 2023, such as the SDG Summit, the High Level Dialogue on Financing for Development, the High Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage.

vi. The Summit must be complementary to, and not compete with, the above-mentioned events. Moreover, since the Summit is meant to ‘turbo-charge’ SDG implementation, it should benefit from and be informed by the above-mentioned events.

vii. At this stage, as the holding of the Summit in 2023 may necessitate overlap with several other events, it is important to ensure that smaller delegations from the G77 and China are able to keep track of all processes and participate at high-level .

5. Hence, the timing of the Summit should be decided accordingly, keeping all of the above factors in mind. A clear road map, providing timelines for negotiations on the modalities resolution, for the preparatory processes or events (if any) leading up to the Summit, and for the negotiations on the outcome document, is essential.

6. On the Declaration on Future Generations, the Group would highlight the following points:

i. The majority of future generations will be born in the global South. Hence, the Declaration must incorporate the needs, priorities and aspirations of developing countries.

ii. The world today is the harbinger of the future. Hence, achieving intra-generational equity is the only possible path towards inter-generational equity.

iii. The 2030 Agenda and its implementation is our agreed roadmap for safeguarding the interests of both current and future generations.

iv. The Declaration on Future Generations should provide guidance to ‘turbo-charge’ the implementation of the 2030 Agenda in an inclusive and equitable manner. Its focus should be on implementation of existing commitments.

v. This is only possible through the provision of adequate, predictable and sustainable means of implementation, including access to concessional finance, technology transfer on concessional and preferential terms and capacity building for developing countries.

vi. Therefore, the Declaration on future Generation should provide guidance on how these means of implementation could be ensured.

vii. The Declaration must consider all three dimensions of sustainable development, economic, social and environmental, in a balanced manner.

viii. It must reaffirm our commitment to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

ix. The elimination of unilateral economic, financial, or trade measures not in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations that impede the full achievement of economic and social development, particularly in developing countries, is also essential.

7. Detailed written inputs of the Group on the elements paper for the Declaration will be provided by the deadline of 10 August.

Effective Multilateralism

8. The Group believes that in order to overcome the challenges facing our world today, a renewed commitment to multilateralism, international solidarity and cooperation is required.

9. The international community needs to recognize the UN’s pivotal role in supporting countries to tackle present and future problems and the challenges facing humanity and arriving at their solutions.

10. In the Group’s view, effective implementation of the United Nations Charter is required to promote adherence to international law, and advance the mutually reinforcing objectives of human rights, development and peace and security.

I thank you.

Mr. President,

1. I have the honour to deliver this Statement on behalf of the G77 and China.

2. At the outset, allow me to thank the President and Secretariat of the Economic and Social Council for the preparation of this year’s High-Level Political Forum.

3. I would also express appreciation to the Permanent Representatives of Italy and Nauru, and their respective teams, for their efforts in facilitating the consultation process on the Ministerial Declaration. I would also express the Groups appreciation to our coordinators, the experts from Philippines, Indonesia, and Iraq who negotiated on behalf of Group.

Mr. President,

4. More than 2 years since the onset of the pandemic, the High-Level Political Forum holds extreme importance to send a strong signal of our commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals in this decade of action.

5. Accordingly, the Group has engaged constructively and in good faith throughout the negotiations with a view to reaching a balanced, substantive and consensus-based outcome document.

6. However, the Group would take this opportunity to register that the process followed this year could have been better by allowing sufficient time for in-depth inter-governmental negotiations on important issues as well as for internal consultations within our Group and other groups.

7. We believe that in future, the negotiating process must be conducted in a manner to allow for complete, full and transparent inter-governmental negotiations, which should avoid scheduling conflicts with other ongoing processes. The timelines set for the process must be realistic.

Mr. President,

8. The Group of 77 and China has joined consensus on the Ministerial Declaration, recognizing the importance to
adopt a meaningful Ministerial Declaration at a time when developing countries continue to suffer disproportionately from the impact of various global crises.

9. Notwithstanding this, the Group wishes to make the following statement in explanation of its position on several elements of the HLPF Ministerial Declaration:

10. First, the Group attaches the utmost importance to addressing the challenges and needs faced by all developing countries, especially countries in special situations and those facing specific challenges.

11. Hence, while we appreciate the reference in Paragraph 10, the Group is deeply disappointed that the list of countries does not include a reference to “countries and peoples living under colonial and foreign occupation”. At this juncture, when we are witnessing a grave existential threat against Palestine, one of our Members of the Group, it is critical for us to reaffirm our commitment to leave no one behind.

12. Second, the Group reaffirms our firm rejection of unilateral economic, financial or trade measures and reiterates the urgent need to eliminate them immediately. In this regard, we are deeply disappointed that our proposal for a standalone paragraph on this, taken verbatim from paragraph 30 of the 2030 Agenda, was not included.

13. Third, the Group regrets that our proposal for a standalone paragraph on the Right to Development as an inalienable human right was not included in the final draft.

14. Fourth, the Group also regrets that our proposal for the inclusion of a reference to ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities in the light of different national circumstance’ in Paragraph 61 was not accommodated. In view of the historically different contributions to global environmental degradation, developed countries must acknowledge the responsibility they bear in the international pursuit of sustainable development.

15. Fifth, the Group is disappointed that our proposals for inclusion of references to ensuring “no country is left behind” were not accommodated.

16. Lastly, in Paragraph 127, the Group does not support the term “vulnerable middle-income countries”. Such a classification of middle-income countries is not multilaterally agreed and is not reflective of the challenges faced by the middle-income countries. Furthermore, it is restrictive in suggesting specific middle-income countries to be provided relief through Resilience and Sustainability Trust (RST) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which is contrary to our pledge of “leaving no one behind”.

Mr. President,

17. In closing, the Group decided to accept the version of the ministerial declaration, tabled before us today, in the interest of ensuring its adoption by consensus towards supporting the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. However, we are extremely disappointed that a vote was requested on certain paragraphs. This communicates a negative political message regarding our collective endeavors with regards to the follow up and implementation of the 2030 agenda.

General Comments

Distinguished Co-Facilitators,

1) I have the honor to deliver these remarks on the behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

2) I would start with some general comments. At the outset, let me thank the co-facilitators for their efforts in preparing the Second Rev. We note that some of the Groups inputs were taken on board. However, we note with concern that several of our inputs, on issues of key importance for the group, have not been taken on board.

3) The Group would highlight that these inputs have been consistently put forward by the Group in previous consultations and will be proposed again in this round. We would also highlight that we consider the inclusion of these proposals of the utmost importance for the Ministerial Declaration.

4) The Group would also highlight the need for this to remain an inter-governmental process, and that sufficient time be provided to react to other delegations proposals. We hope the Expert meeting scheduled for Monday will provide this opportunity.

5) The Group would reiterate the need to adhere to terminologies from multilaterally agreed UN documents, such as the 2030 Agenda, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, the Paris Agreement under UNFCCC, and other major UN outcome documents in the economic, social and environmental fields throughout this text.

Section I Introduction (Para 1-11)

Co-Facilitators,

6) On Paragraphs 1 and 2, the Group has proposes to incorporate the second sentence of Paragraph 2 into Paragraph 1 in order to streamline and avoid duplication.

7) On Para 3, the Group proposes to add ‘leave no country’ before ‘leave no one behind’. With regards to the third sentence of this paragraph, the Group notes with appreciation that our inputs for inclusion of the reference to the Declaration on the Right to Development have been incorporated. We propose to split this paragraph into two parts, starting from the second sentence.

8) Furthermore, the Group has consistently proposed an additional paragraph elaborating on the right to development as an inalienable human right and would reiterate our request for its inclusion.

9) On Para 4, we propose to delete the reference to hunger, malnutrition and food security in the first sentence. Instead we propose an additional sentence on reaffirming the importance of achieving food security and expressing concern over the drastic increase in hunger, malnutrition and food insecurity, especially in developing countries. We also reiterate our previous proposal that we should ‘remain gravely concerned’ on the increase in the global poverty rate rather than the current language which states ‘note with concern’.

10) On Paragraph 5, we reiterate our request for deletion of the second sentence.

11) On Paragraph 6, we propose a small addition to the last sentence stating that ‘we reaffirm that the 2030 Agenda and its SDGs also seek to realise the human rights of all’.

12) On Paragraph 7, we appreciate that the Groups proposal for inclusion of the UNFCC, the New Urban Agenda and the CBD have been taken on board.

13) On Paragraph 8, the group notes that in the last sentence, the reference to centrality of good and inclusive governance and rule of law has been reinserted in this Rev. The Group’s position remains the same, and we reiterate our proposal to delete this reference. We also propose the addition of malnutrition after food insecurity in order to maintain consistency.

14) On Paragraph 9, we propose that we ‘reaffirm’ the primary responsibility of governments instead of ‘recognise’. We also propose that the reference to the central role of the UN system should come before the reference to other stakeholders. Moreover, we propose the addition of ‘other relevant’ before stakeholders and the deletion of the reference to civil society and private sector.

15) On Paragraph 10 regarding the listing, the Group reiterates our request for the inclusion of a reference to ‘countries and people under foreign occupation’.

16) The Group has consistently proposed that the addition of a paragraph referring to the need for effective measures to be taken to remove the obstacles to the full realisation of the right to self-determination of people’s living under colonial and foreign occupation.

17) We have also consistently proposed the addition of a paragraph on the need to respect the territorial integrity and political independence of States.

18) Both of these proposals are based on agreed language, both from last years HLPF Ministerial Declaration and from the 2030 Agenda. We are extremely concerned that despite our repeated request for the inclusion of these paragraphs, our inputs have been disregarded.

19) The Group is also concerned that our repeated proposal for the inclusion of a paragraph on Unilateral Economic, Financial or Trade measures not in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations has not been taken into account. We would highlight again that this proposal is verbatim from the 2030 Agenda.

Section II Impact of COVID-19 (Para 12-33)

20) On paragraph 11, we have minor amendments to change ‘generate’ to ‘exacerbate’, to add a reference to local communities after indigenous peoples, to change workers in the informal economy to informal sector and to delete the reference to other marginalised groups at the end of the sentence.

21) On paragraph 13, the group proposes minor changes to the language. The addition of children after women, the addition of a reference to barriers to access financial resources, addition of a reference to resilient infrastructure and sustainable industrialisation, the addition of environmental degradation, desertification and the addition of a reference to leave no country and no one behind.. The group also proposes the deletion of ‘low carbon’ before development pathways in the last sentence.

22) On paragraph 14, we propose the addition of protectionism, unsustainable consumption and production patterns. We also propose that we should add a reference to strengthening the resilience of global value and supply chains.

23) On Paragraph 15, we note that our previous proposal had only partially been taken on board. We reiterate our previous proposal, which is in our written inputs.

24) On Paragraph 16, we propose adding amongst others after coordinated approach and to delete the reference to health emergencies as it limits the scope of the paragraph.

25) On Paragraph 17, we note that our inputs have been taken on board with regards to local and regional manufacturing and support the retention of that. We propose that ‘immunization’ be changed to ‘vaccination’.

26) On Paragraph 18 we note that the reference to CTAP has been removed. We request for its inclusion again. We also note that our inputs on helping developing countries to meet their vaccination needs have been incorporated.

27) On Paragraph 22, the Group has the following remarks:

– On Paragraph 22 (a), we propose changing the full and equal enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms to recognizing the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest standard of physical and mental health. We also propose the deletion of voluntary.
– On Paragraph 22 (b), we note that the language has regressed, and that all reference to TRIPs flexibilities has been removed. We propose the addition of an alternative 22 (b), based on last years HLPF Ministerial Declaration.
– On Paragraph 22 (e), the Group proposes the deletion of the reference to the One Health Approach.
28) The Group also notes that our consistent proposal for the inclusion of a reference to the positive contribution of migrants for inclusive growth and sustainable development and to the COVID-19 response and recovery has not been reflected. Our detailed proposal is in our written inputs and we reiterate our request for its inclusion.

29) On Paragraph 24, we propose additional language on how the development and implementation of risk-informed plans are essential for Sustainable Development.

30) On Paragraph 25, we propose the deletion of ‘care’ as there is a lack of clarity on its meaning

31) We propose moving paragraphs 26 and 27 to the Introduction Section with some minor amendments.

Section III Goals under in depth Review and VNRs (Para 28-30 bis)

32) On Paragraph 28, the Group reiterates our request for the inclusion of a reference appreciating the Group of Friends of the VNRs. We note that such a reference was also in last years Ministerial Declaration and would appreciate a rationale for its consistent exclusion this year. We also propose to change ‘nationally driven’ to ‘locally driven’ in line with agreed language from last year.

33) On Paragraph 29, the Group proposes that addition of relevant before stakeholders and the deletion of the reference to civil society and local governments. We also propose the addition of ‘where appropriate’

34) On Paragraph 30, we propose the addition of a reference to localisation of the SDGs

SDG 4 (Para 31 – 49)

35) On Para 32, the Group proposes changing children from disadvantaged backgrounds to children and youth in vulnerable situations. We also propose deleting the reference to persons in vulnerable situations and marginalised groups. Our other amendments are in our written inputs.

36) On Paragraph 33, we propose adding ‘the achievement of’ in front of sustainable development. We propose adding ‘but not limited to’ before early childhood development. We propose the deletion of ‘in line with the Paris Declaration’ and the references to the international benchmarks of 4-6% and 15-20% of public expenditure. We also highlight that it should be small island developing states.

37) On Paragraph 34, the Group requests for the inclusion of school safety and propose the deletion of sexual and gender based and all form of violence and child abuse. We propose the addition of a sentence on providing safe, non-violent, inclusive and effective learning environments for all. We propose changing re-enrolment to re-engagement and the deletion of discriminated groups. Our complete detailed proposals on this Paragraph will be provided in our written inputs.

38) On Paragraph 35, we propose the deletion of the reference to the COVID-19 pandemic

39) On Paragraph 36, the Group proposes the inclusion of providing primary and secondary education for all girls and boys in line with the 2030 Agenda indicator. We propose adding the ’empowerment of girls in and through education’. With regards to the We also propose adding after quality education that ‘promotes youth and women’s economic empowerment’. We propose the deletion of ‘provides opportunities, capacities and understanding’ and ‘strengthens their voices, agency’ and instead suggest to add ‘promotes youth and women’s economic empowerment and enables their full, equal, effective and meaningful partnership’.

40) On Paragraph 37, the Group proposes to change low and no tech solutions to low and no tech strategies.

41) On Paragraph 38, we propose adding ‘but not limited to’ before the Global Education Cooperation mechanism.

42) On Paragraph 39, we propose that the summit should work towards ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all and suggest the deletion of the reference to the summit ensuring a resilient, inclusive and sustainable recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic that advances equality in education and contributes to peaceful, inclusive and sustainable futures. We also propose some priority areas for the summit, which will be in our written inputs.

43) We propose an additional paragraph on the report of the Institute of Statistics of UNESCO on education statistics.

SDG 5 (Para 40-51)

44) On Paragraph 40, we propose adding ‘ensure respect for’ before the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights. We propose the deletion of throughout their life course. We also propose the deletion of the line ‘efforts must be redoubled to urgently and effectively accelerate action on gender equality and and women’s empowerment, making it a priority in recovery and response measures to COVID-19 and beyond’.

45) On Paragraphs 43, we propose the deletion of gender-responsive before risk governance. We also propose the deletion of ‘gender sensitive’ before disaster risk reduction policies in the last sentence.

46) On Paragraph 48, we propose the deletion of the last sentence.

47) We propose the addition of an additional paragraph on cooperation to eliminate situations of vulnerability for women migrant workers.

48) On Paragraph 50, we propose changing gender-disaggregated data to sex-disaggregated data.

49) On Paragraph 51, we note that our inputs were only partially taken on board. We reiterate our previous proposal on 51 as a 51Alt.

SDG 14 (Para 52-65)

50) On Paragraph 52, the Group proposes the addition of a reference to the Second UN Ocean Conference to be held on 27 June.

51) On Paragraph 54, we reiterate our previous proposal for the addition of a sentence ‘as recalled in Paragraph 158 of the Future We Want’.

52) On Paragraph 56, we propose deletion of the reference to ‘aggravated by the pandemic’ and instead propose language on the threat to ocean health caused by improper waste management caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We request for a source on the reference to half of live coral cover on coral reefs being lost since 1870.

53) On Paragraph 58, we propose the addition of adequate before financial resources. We also propose the deletion of voluntary.

54) On Paragraph 59, we propose the addition of ‘especially in the marine environment’ after plastic pollution. We propose the deletion of all sources and propose changing circular approaches to sustainable economy approaches in line with 2030 Agenda language.

55) On Paragraph 60, we have slight amendments which will be in our written inputs.

56) On Paragraph 61, we propose adding balanced, practical, effective, robust and transformative in front of the qualifiers and deleting transformational in line with previous agreed language. We also propose adding robust, balanced and effective agreement before the qualifiers for BBNJ.

57) On Paragraph 62, we propose deleting the reference to efforts to conserve at least 30% of the globe ocean within marine protected areas and instead propose moving it to Section V.

58) On Paragraph 62ter, we propose the addition of a reference to south and triangular cooperation. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

59) On Paragraph 64 we highlight the Group’s strong preference for the formulation of nature-based solutions, ecosystem based approaches, among approaches. Hence, we propose the deletion of ‘and’.

60) On Paragraph 65, we propose to change welcome to note.

61) On Paragraph 66, we ask for the source of language in the first sentence

SDG 15 (Para 66-80)

62) On Paragraph 68, we propose adding ‘challenges of a global dimension’ after drought. We also propose language on highlighting the particular challenges this poses for Africa, the LDCs and the LLDCs. We propose the deletion of the second last sentence.

63) On Paragraph 69, we propose the deletion of the sentence ‘in particular around cross cutting issues such as food systems’. We also propose the deletion of the last sentence.

64) On Paragraph 70, the Group proposes the addition of mountains ecosystems. We also propose changing poverty alleviation to eradication,

65) On paragraph 71, we propose the deletion of ‘voluntary’ and ‘mutually agreed terms’.We highlight here again the Group’s strong preference for the formulation ‘nature-based solutions, ecosystem based approaches, among other approaches’. Hence, we propose the deletion of ‘and’ again.

66) On Paragraph 72, the Group proposes to add the qualifiers balanced, practical, effective, robust and transformative before the post-2020 framework and propose the deletion of transformational.

67) We also propose splitting the paragraph, with a separate paragraph focused on the convening of the first Part of COP. Our detailed proposal is in our written inputs.

68) On Paragraph 73, we propose using ‘protecting, conserving, restoring and sustainIng terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems.’ We propose the addition of local communities after indigenous peoples. We propose the deletion of the reference to the 30% target and instead propose to have one reference to it in the Way Forward Section.

69) On Paragraph 74, we propose taking note of the Glasgow Leaders Declaration on Forests and Land Use instead of welcome.

70) We propose an additional paragraph on the contribution of sustainable use, protection , conservation and restoration of mountain ecosystems to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Our detailed proposal is in our written inputs.

71) On Paragraph 77, we propose the addition of measurable, predictable, and effective resources to developing countries. We also propose the deletion of from all sources, public and private. We propose the deletion of voluntary. We also propose the deletion of the references to subsidies.

SDG 17 (Para 81-92)

72) On Paragraph 81, the Group notes that our inputs were not taken on board. We reiterate our previous proposal on strengthening international cooperation Our detailed proposal is in our written inputs.

73) We note with appreciation that our proposal for the need to develop measurements of progress that complement or go beyond GDP has been taken on board.

74) On Paragraph 86, the Group proposes to delete ‘and’ after food security.

75) We reiterate our previous proposal for an additional paragraph on FDI, which has not been included,

76) On Paragraph 88, we propose additional language on South South Cooperation as an important element of international cooperation for development as a complement to but not a substitute for North-South Cooperation. We also propose reiterating that International Development Cooperation, especially North-South Cooperation, remains a fundamental catalyst for development. Our detailed inputs will be in our written inputs.

77) On Paragraph 90, we propose the deletion of the line starting from ‘including adherence to agreed development cooperation principles’. Instead we propose using agreed language from the FFD outcome document.

78) We will also propose an additional paragraph on the importance of taking targeted measures to eradicate poverty in all its forms and dimensions everywhere, including extreme poverty, with enhanced international support and strengthened global partnerships in our written inputs

79) On Paragraph 93, we propose adding language on the need for greater integration of landlocked developing countries into world trade and global value chains. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

80) We propose the deletion of Paragraph 94, as it is duplicative of Paragraph 120. We also propose incorporating elements from 94 into 120.

81) We note that our proposal on the role of MSMEs in contributing to SDG implementation has not been incorporated and reiterate our previous proposal in this regards.

Other Priority Issues

82) On Paragraph 98, the Group notes that our inputs have not been incorporated. Hence, the Group reiterates our previous proposals as alternative paragraphs on 98.

83) We propose a paragraph on the challenges posed by climate change, and including a reference to the recent IPCC report. We also propose within this paragraph to urge for the full implementation of all commitments, including the Paris Agreement, all the outcomes of the 26th COP, including the Glasgow climate pact and working towards an ambitious COP 27.

84) Next we propose another paragraph on temperature targets and the aim to reach global peaking as soon as possible, recognizing that it will take longer for developing country parties and that accelerated action is required in this decade on the basis of equity, reflecting common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities and in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty. Our detailed proposal is in our written inputs.

85) The Group is also concerned about the approach taken to the Alt Paragraphs on climate finance provided in the previous text. We note that despite the Group’s inputs, several aspects, including the need to fully deliver on USD 100 billion overdue in 2020 urgently, the need for doubling the collective provision of climate finance from 2019 levels by 2025, and the decision to set a new collective quantified climate finance goal from a floor of 100 billion have not been reflected despite the Group’s strong preference. Hence, we propose an additional paragraph addressing these issues.

86) We propose an additional paragraph on the importance of promoting socio-economic development in rural areas.

87) On Paragraph 100, we propose deletion of clean in order to align it with the 2030 Agenda target.

88) On Paragraph 101, we reiterate our previous proposal to take note of the establishment of the Global Crisis Response Group and propose additional language in line with the FFD outcome document. We also propose deletion of the reference to the first brief of the Group.

89) On Paragraph 102, we propose the deletion of ‘voluntary’

90) We propose an additional paragraph on the need to create conditions for decent work for all. We also propose the inclusion of a reference to the Global Accelerator on Jobs and Social Protection for Just Transitions. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

91) On Paragraph 105, we propose language on welcoming the appointment of the panel to finalise the Multi-Dimensional Vulnerability Index and encouraging the international community to consider multi-dimensional vulnerability as a criteria to access concessional finance. The proposal is based on the agreed language from the FFD Outcome Document.

92) On Paragraph 107, w proposal deletion of the reference to ‘the dangers and risks associated with illegal drugs’. Instead we propose additional language on the need to protect children from the illicit use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances as defined in the relevant international treaties. We also propose deletion of the last sentence. Our detailed proposal is in our written inputs.

93) On Paragraph 108, we propose to add a reference to the need for adequate, predictable, and sustainable funding of the RC system.

94) We reiterate our previous proposal for the addition of a paragraph on the need to strengthening our social protection systems.

Our Roadmap for the Way Forward (Para 109-135)

95) On Paragraph 109, we propose the addition of desertification, drought and land degradation. We also propose the addition of ‘relevant’ before stakeholders.

96) On Para 110, we propose to refer to the OCA as a proposed concrete vision and basis for further consideration by Member States to accelerate implementation of agreed frameworks, including the 2030 Agenda.

97) On Paragraph 111, we propose its deletion as it is duplicative with Paragraph 40.

98) On Paragraph 114, we have the following proposals:

– On the Chapeau of the paragraph, we propose changing we are committed to ‘we will strive’. We also propose adding climate change, environmental degradation. We propose changing crises to challenges.
– On 114 a, we propose deletion of ‘with the aim’. We also propose the deletion of the latter part of the sentence, starting from ‘especially those that are especially vulnerable..’
– On 114 b, we propose deletion of ‘prevent over exploitation of natural resources’. We also propose changing ‘circular economy approaches’ to ‘sustainable economy approaches’.
– On 114 d, we propose deleting ‘both land and ocean-based marine litter’. Instead we propose that it read ‘plastic pollution, including in the marine environment and marine litter’
– We reiterate our proposal for deletion of 114 (f)

99) We propose the addition of an additional paragraph on the voluntary commitments by more than 100 Member States to conserve at least 30% of land and 30% of the global Ocean.

100) We reiterate our previous proposal for a 116-pre paragraph on investment in quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure for the COVID-19 recovery and the achievement of sustainable development in its economic, social and environmental dimensions.

101) On Paragraph 116, we propose some additional language on support required for developing countries in project identification and mobilization of private and public investment.

102) On Paragraph 117, we propose a reference to voluntary channeling US$ 250 billion SDRs to all developing countries in need. We also propose the deletion of the reference to ‘vulnerable’ middle income countries, highlighting that this is not a multilaterally agreed classification and instead propose that it read middle income countries instead.

103) On 118, we propose that relevant UN actors and the Hub hold intergovernmental consultations on the format and modality of the stocktaking moment.

104) On Paragraph 119, we propose that we take note of the Quadrennial Secretary General’s report on the progress on the implementation of the New Urban Agenda.

105) On Paragraph 120, we propose to reaffirm our commitment to promote a universal, rules-based, open, non-discriminatory, equitable, transparent and predictable multilateral trading system.

106) The Group expresses its grave concern on the approach adopted for Paragraph 123. The Group had expressed its clear preference for the agreed language from the 2030 Agenda and from last years Ministerial Declaration. Yet, we note that our inputs were not taken into account. We stress that such an approach would not result in a consensual Ministerial Declaration. The Group emphasizes that Paragraph 123, as it stands, would not result in consensus. We reiterate our earlier proposed language, which is also verbatim Paragraphs 29 and 30 from last years Ministerial Declaration and also reiterate our earlier proposal to place these paragraphs in the Introduction Section.

107) On Paragraph 125, we propose on the fifth sub-bullet to add that any use of digital technologies must be compliant with all relevant national regulations.

108) On Paragraph 127, we propose replacing uncertainty with emergency.

109) On Paragraph 128, we propose adding a reference to looking forward to the convening of the second part of the Fifth UN Conference on LDCs, which will be held in Doha from 5-9 March 2023.

110) On Paragraph 129, we propose to split the paragraphs in order to have separate paragraphs on the Third UN Conference on LLDCs and the Fourth UN Conference for SIDS. Our detailed proposal is in our written inputs.

111) On Paragraph 131, we propose to add a reference to the first part of COP 15. We propose to take note with appreciation of UN@50. We also propose to simply take note of the outcome of Stockholm + 50. We propose deletion of transformational and addition the qualifiers of balanced, practical, effective, robust and transformative before the post-2020 Global Bio-Diversity Framework.

112) On paragraph 132, we propose to add the High Level Meeting of the General Assembly before the reference to the Mid-Term Review of the Sendai Framework.

Madam Chair,
Excellencies,
Dear Colleagues,

I have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of G77 and China.

While we were already off-track in achieving the SDGs, there is no doubt that the Covid-19 Pandemic and geopolitical tensions have adversely impacted and undermined many development gains. Extreme poverty and hunger are again on the rise.

It is also evident that the developing counties have been disproportionately impacted by the current crisis and that they do not have the necessary fiscal space to achieve all SDGs in the backdrop of unsustainable debt burden, rising commodity prices, global inflation, among other ongoing challenges.

These financial difficulties have pushed many developing countries on the brink of making hard choices: either to save lives of their people or repay their debt.

During the time of extreme economic hardshipand when the developing countries are grappling with the multiple crises, the Development Pillar of the UN Development System must be fully strengthened.

The Group re-emphasizes that the mandates set by the General Assembly in the QCPR must be fully implemented by the UN Development System.The Executive Boards need to play their oversight and guidance role to ensure full compliance of the agreed mandates.

The decisions by the Executive Board must re-emphasize these mandates and do not renegotiate the delicate balance already achieved at the General Assembly and the ECOSOC. decisions not in line with these mandates, may not be considered as precedent for the future discussions and decisions.

For the Group, basic principles such as national ownership and leadership are of critical importance for the delivery of effective results. There should be no one-size-fits-all approach and each country programme must be reflective of the realities and needs of the programme country

It is evident that delicate balance in the QCPR is already being jeopardized by emphasizing on institutional matters of the agencies, even in the context of their country operations and the bilateral relationship with programme countries.

The QCPR is clear: ‘eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development, as set out in the 2030 Agenda’.

It is therefore regrettable that there still seems to be resistance in recognizing that poverty eradication remains the overarching goal of the United Nations development system.

The Group recognizes the importance of getting UNOPS back on its track and emphasizes the vital contributions of UNOPS to developing countries and to the UN development system itself. The reported irregularities related to S3i investments are of course the object of serious concern among Member States.

The focus on internal controls review needs, however, to be overcome as a matter of urgency, as we need to bring the focus back to development.

In addition, there seems to push a vision of operational activities towards exclusively focusing on efficiencies and institutional matters, without proper regard or reference to the concerning status of global development and the path towards the SDGs -including, as stated by G-77, the funding gap for the UN development pillar, the unfulfilled funding commitments by the developed countries, and the need to invest more intergovernmental energy, political will and resources in integrated solutions rather than in bureaucratic discussions.

I thank you.

Madam President,
Members of the Executive Board,

1. I have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of the G77 and China.

2. In order to progress towards a sustainable, inclusive and resilient recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and to achieve the 2030 Agenda within the remaining decade of action, we must accelerate our efforts to reach the furthest behind first.

3. In the Least Developed Countries, low vaccination rates, combined with mounting debt challenges, accelerating inflation,and rising food insecurity suggest a long and arduous path towards recovery. Some estimates posit that $1 trillion would be needed annually to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals in the 46 LDCs. The annual estimated financing gap in achieving the 2030 Agenda is at least $400 billion.

4. The Group takes note of the UNCDF’s report on results for 2021 and appreciates the progress made, including reaching the highest ever level of delivery and revenues for the organization.

5. Appreciate the role UNCDF plays in providing financing solutions that benefit last mile populations in the LDCs. UNCDF’s support for financial inclusion in developingcountries is important and the organization’s transition towards a greater focus on expanding digital financial services is a welcome step. Equipping LDCs to seize opportunities from digital finance and the broader digital transformation will be critical to allow their economies to grow and increase their productivity.

6. Encourage UNCDF’s to continue efforts to support mobilization of SDG financing for local governments and other local actors as a UN hub for local government financing. In particular, note the progress with the Local Climate Adaptive Living Facility initiative, LoCAL, which continues to increase the number of countries it supports and which also enjoys strong ownership from the participating countries.

7. Note the expansion in 2021 of UNCDF’s loan and guarantee portfolio, focusing especially on small and medium-sized enterprises in LDCs. When strategically used and targeted, this type of financing is critical to help mobilize larger amounts of financing for SDG positive SMEs.

8. UNCDF’s on balance sheet investment vehicle, the BRIDGE Facility, is also an important support mechanism for the implementation of the Doha Programme of Action, delivering catalytic investment capital for MSMEs and small investment projects in LDCs and graduated countries. We encourage supporting UNCDF in scaling up this facility.

Madam President,
Distinguished Members of the Board
The UNDP Administrator,

1. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

2. The Group congratulates you and other members of the Bureau on your able leadership during the challenging times.The Group also wishes to thank UNDP Administrator, Mr. Achim Steiner, for the report on the work of the Organization.

Madam President,

3. In 2021, multiple crises threatened global development gains.While the world is still reeling from the devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the looming climate catastrophe, the current geopolitical tension is coup de grâce to achieving the 2030 Agenda within the remaining decade of action if we don’t commit to bold and immediate actions.

4. The compounded challenges of unsustainable debt burden; rising commodity prices and inflation; increase in borrowing cost; and liquidity constraints compelling many governments in the developing countries to make the hard choices between saving peoples lives and repaying their debts.

5. These extreme financial difficulties have already pushed some developing countries to default; others may follow the suit.

6. The United Nations Development System has a crucial role to play in supporting countries national efforts to achieve the SDGs and meeting the development challenge. The Group appreciates the efforts by the UNDP in helping the developing countries in this regard.

7. The Executive Board’s role is to ensure thatimplementingagencies are equipped with guidance and tools to address those challenges.To guide the work of the board, we would like to highlight some of the Group’s priorities

– First,eradication of poverty must remain core focus of the UNDP work.
– Second,access to concessional finance is of crucial importance for the developing countries. The Group appreciated the work by the UNDP in supporting developing countries in this regard and requests that this support to be further expanded.
– Third, access to liquidity must be complemented by other immediate measures, includingby fulfillment of the longstanding commitments of the 0.7% of GNI ODA and$100 billion in annual Climate Finance by developed countries, emergency measures to address debt distress in many developing countries and re-channeling of at least US$ 250 billion of un-utilized SDRs to developing countries in need of liquidity.
– Fourth, more concerted efforts are needed to ensure universal access to social protection measures as a means of saving lives and livelihoods.
– Fifth, mobilization of adequate investment in quality, reliable, sustainable, and resilient infrastructure in energy, agriculture, communications, transport, and technology should be a part of synergetic strategy for COVID-19 recovery, sustainable development, and climate action.

Madam President,

8. We are all aware of the looming multiple interlinked crises facing us, which will undoubtedly impact the poorest disproportionately.

9. In order to respond effectively to these, there is a dire need for the UN Development System to have access to predictable and regular financial resources. Hence, the Group is extremely concerned about the trend of major cuts in core allocation for development.

10. In addition to the pervasive imbalance between core and non-core resources, these recent funding cuts threaten the long-term viability of the UN development pillar, which also, through the support in countries in conflict and post-conflict situations, contributes to peacebuilding and sustaining peace when reducing people’s needs, addressing risks for development programming and fostering resilience, in accordance with each agency’s mandates.

11. While the world is experiencing immediate humanitarian urgencies, we are also on the verge of a global development crisis and these cuts in core funding of the UNDS could have a lasting effects on the most vulnerable, stall the collective development trajectories over the last decades, and well-being, of people in the developing world -as well as on the institutions that are designed to deliver on the development aspirations

12. In many ways, cutting funding for development is the opposite of what the world needs at a moment.

13. We strongly reiterate the high level of importance programme countries accord to the core development mandate of the UN Development Agencies, in particular UNDP, and we would like to stress the importance and necessity of core resources for the UNDP to deliver on its important mandates.

14. The Group looks forward to a constructive discussion during this session of the Executive Board and we look forward to strengthening our close cooperation with UNDP with the aim of achieving long-term development.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

I have the honour to deliver the statement on behalf of G77 and China.

The world today is confronted with interlinked crises of Conflict, Climate Change and Environmental Degradation, as well as the socio-economic downturns caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, aggravated further by an increase in global inflation, which rose to a decade high-level of 5.2% last year.

Painfully the developing countries are impacted disproportionately particularly because of unsustainable debt burden that many of them have accrued right now.

To confront these challenges, we need a transformative vision, a strong expression of global solidarity, and a collective will to support the national efforts of developing countries to build resilience against future shocks.

The Group of G-77 and China suggests that our collective “call to action” to deal these challenges should:

First, enhance cooperation, collaboration and coordination of development activities especially for those countries that are either facing humanitarian emergencies or are in conflict situations.

Second, scale up climate resilience across food systems, in line with national priorities/strategies and circumstances while recognizing that there is no one one-size-fits-all solution.

Third, rationalize international agricultural trade including by addressing huge agricultural subsidies provided by certain richer economies that not only distort global markets but also make it impossible for farmers in the developing countries to compete.

Fourth, focus on flexibility and speed to ensure the timely provision of emergency concessional financing, including grants, with an emphasis on ensuring net – positive resource transfers to countries experiencing social and economic distress.

Fifth, meet external financing needs of developing countries especially in the form of extraordinary emergency measures for countries in, or at high risk of, debt distress.

Sixth, the bulk of the historic allocation of US$ 650 billion SDRs has gone to developed countries. We must aim to channelize at least US$250bn of US$650bn to address the liquidity crisis in developing countries.

Seventh, fulfill developed countries’ commitment to provide $100bn per year towards climate finance and start discussions for climate finance beyond 2025 from the floor of $100bn.

Eighth, fulfill ODA commitment of 0.7 per cent of GNI, as well as protect current shares of assistance to developing countries.

Ninth, scale up investments in sustainable agriculture infrastructure – to facilitate transport, production and distribution of agricultural inputs and food products.

The Group is greatly concerned about the visible trend of major cuts in core allocation for development that impedes the critical role of UN Development agencies to support efforts of developing countries in achieving the SDGs.

Cutting funding for development and defunding the key development agencies of the UN system is the opposite of what the world needs at the moment.

Lastly, the Group also likes to reiterate that the mandates set by the General Assembly in the QCPR must be fully adhered to and implemented by the UN Development System. Executive Boards need to play their oversight and guidance role to ensure compliance with the agreed mandates and ensure that the UN entities potential and capabilities are strengthened and fully realised.

In this critical context, when the developing countries are grappling with the triple crisis, the time is for action and strengthening of the Development Pillar of the UN Development System is essential.

I thank you.

Excellencies,

1) I have the honor to deliver these remarks on behalf of Group of 77 and China.

2) At the outset, allow me to appreciate the Co-Chairs of this leadership dialogue – Germany and Indonesia – for their hard work.

3) Countries around the world are still suffering from the worst effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Millions have lost their jobs and are facing extreme hardships in the form of increasing food prices and hunger, extreme poverty, and unsustainable debts.

4) All these challenges have disproportionately impacted the developing countries. Their miseries and economic hardships have been further aggravated by the devastating impacts of climate change and heightened geo-political tensions.

Excellencies,

5) There is no doubt that if we continue the path of unsustainable consumption and production, we risk reinforcing our social, environmental, and economic vulnerabilities.

6) The achievement of the 2030 Agenda goals and targets and the successful and effective implementation of the UNFCCC and its Paris agreement are seriously in question. The Group, therefore, proposes the following actions:

7) First, we must take urgent actions in key covid-affected sectors, such as food, energy, and the tourism and manufacturing sectors, to protect the poor and most vulnerable living in the developing countries.

8) This includes ensuring that our supply chains are resilient, ready to adapt and can deliver quality assured products and materials in the face of future pandemics.

9) This also includes recognizing the essential role of Micro, Small, and Medium Sized Enterprises (MSMEs), which provide jobs and income to a large portion of our workforces, in achieving an inclusive and transformative recovery.

10) Second, it is important to mobilize adequate financial resources to enable recovery. An additional US$ 4-5 trillion are needed to finance recovery in the developing countries. So far, only a fraction of this has been made available. We should utilize all possible channels to mobilize finances: ODA; debt relief; rechanneling of SDRs, expanding financing facility for MDBs.

11) Third, we must re-think our patterns of consumption and production. We can produce with greater respect for nature. We can stop the pollution of our lakes, rivers, and oceans. We can produce more with less water, and without dangerous chemicals.

12) Technology transfers and technical assistance are key to achieve these goals and environmentally conscious lifestyles should also be encouraged.

13) We must also recall the harmful impacts of agricultural subsidies and protectionist policies on sustainable food systems. A universal, open, non-discriminatory, and equitable multilateral trading system is necessary to facilitate access to safe, diverse, and nutritious food.

14) Fourth, recovery efforts should also address the widening technology and digital gap that exists between the developed and developing countries. Without equal access to innovative and clean technologies, the current digital divide may become the new face of development divide.

15) Fifth, we must work towards promoting the alignment of business practices with the SDGs and the UNFCCC and its Paris Agreement. We also need to adopt criteria of beyond GDP in measuring and calculating progress.

16) Sixth, the pandemic has highlighted the need for better foresight capability and resilience planning in national and international governance. This cannot be achieved without building the capacities of developing countries on data collection and analysis and without equal access to internet for all particularly in developing countries.

17) We need to improve market access for developing countries and promote their inclusion in the global supply chains. It is crucial that we combat the growing digital divide to ensure equitable digital access and opportunities for all.

18) Seventh, there is a lot that we can learn from each other. A global repository of successful practices from the South as well as from the North would increase our knowledge base for the pursuit of our collective future of harmony with nature.

19) And finally, the Group also believes that discussion outside the existing multilaterally agreed frameworks and conventions must not undermine the work and negotiations under these frameworks.

I thank you.

Excellencies,

1) I have the honor to deliver these remarks on behalf of Group of 77 and China.

2) Allow me to begin by appreciating the Co-Chairs of this leadership dialogue – Canada and Ecuador – for their hard work.

3) Today, humanity stands at a crossroads with regard to the legacy it leaves for the future generations.

4) Climate change and biodiversity loss, and the COVID-19 pandemic are among the major challenges that we face today, while persistent levels of poverty, including extreme poverty, inequality, unemployment, social vulnerability, and food insecurity continue to harm developing countries’ capacity to achieve the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its SDGs.

5) As the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated preexisting inequalities between and within our countries, there is an urgent need to enhance international cooperation and solidarity and to address the three dimensions of sustainable development in a balanced and integrated manner.

Excellencies,

6) In the past 50 years, the human population has doubled, the global economy has grown nearly fourfold and global trade has grown tenfold, together driving up the demand for energy and materials.

7) At the same time, developing countries have been unable to benefit from many development gains over the last decades, further aggravating their social, economic, and environmental challenges.

8) Many types of pollution, as well as invasive alien species, are increasing, with negative impacts on nature.

9) Seventy-five percent of the land surface is significantly altered, 66 per cent of the ocean area are experiencing increasing cumulative impacts, and over 85 per cent of wetlands have been lost.

10) None of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets are to be fully met, which threaten the achievement of the SDGs.

11) The COVID-19 pandemic has put into bold the importance of the relationship between people and nature, and it reminds us of consequences of loss of biodiversity and degradation of ecosystems on our own well-being and survival.

Excellencies,

12) It is obvious that we must take urgent actions today for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and the fight against climate change.

13) We need to turn the tide on deforestation, land degradation, and pollution and restore balance with our natural ecosystems and foster innovative business models and technologies that contribute to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.

14) As governments and their partners in the public and private sectors work to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, we can seize this opportunity to achieve a sustainable, inclusive, and resilient recovery.

15) Many commitments have already been made. We must ensure that they are effectively fulfilled, and that the ongoing negotiations, such as on the adoption of a post-2020 global biodiversity framework, are successful.

16) We need a post-2020 framework that promotes the conservation of biodiversity, its sustainable use and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources. But, in particular, we need a framework that includes a substantial increase in finance, capacity building and technology transfer for implementation in developing countries.

17) Let us demonstrate our vision, leadership, and commitment to improve our relationship with nature and place our commitment to conserve, restore, and sustainable use biodiversity and to address climate change at the heart of sustainable development policies.

18) We believe it is the time to accelerate actions, to put nature on a path to recovery by 2030 to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We must also put the environment as a whole – be it biodiversity, the ocean, climate – at the center of our COVID-19 recovery strategies. Science, technology, and capacity building can support such transformation to sustainable and resilient recovery.

19) Finally, the Group also believes that discussion outside the existing multilaterally agreed frameworks and conventions must not undermine the work and negotiations under these frameworks.

I thank you.

Excellencies,

1) It is my honour to deliver this statement on behalf of the G77 and China.

2) There is no doubt that humanity degraded nature and its consequences are becoming clearer by the time. Natural calamities in the form of extreme weather events and climate patterns, such as droughts, floods, desertification, and the emergence of zoonotic diseases are a few of the strong signs of nature’s response.

3) The current unsustainable patterns of consumption and production portends a dooms day scenario. Message from science in this regard is also resounding.

4) Regarding climate change, the most recent IPCC report clearly identifies those actions that are urgently required.

5) We need ambitious and bold actions today to reduce the impacts of climate change and to ensure the protection, conservation, and sustainable use of our environment and natural resources.

Excellencies,

6) The COP26 resulted in positive and ambitious mitigation targets to meet the long-term global goal to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels. This requires rapid and sustained reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions by the developed countries.

7) Developed countries have been historically responsible for the majority of global emissions and should make an absolute and significant reduction in their emissions. In this context, we also emphasize that, in the transition to global net-zero, developed countries must take the lead and this transition should be based on the “principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities”.

8) Moreover, without new, additional, adequate, and predictable financial, technological, and capacity support from developed countries, the developing countries are unable to achieve these goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement.

9) New and additional public climate finance must be urgently mobilized with greater balance between financing for mitigation and adaptation. It is essential to avoid double counting in the provision of development assistance and climate finance.

Excellencies,

10) Developed countries must fully deliver on the long overdue and as yet unrealized goal to mobilize $100bn per year for climate finance for developing countries.

11) We also welcome the agreement at COP26 in Glasgow to initiate further discussions on enhanced commitments for a new collective, quantified goal on climate finance from the floor of $100bn and prior to 2025.

12) We need to ensure concrete and meaningful progress in these deliberations, in a way to significantly boost the provision and mobilization of climate finance in accordance with future requirements and considering the needs and priorities of developing countries.

13) We also highlight the need for long-term and affordable financing for biodiversity and the need to exponentially increase financial flows with biodiversity objectives, including measurable, predictable, and effective, financial resources and institutional arrangements for the provision of finance, capacity building, scientific and technical cooperation, and technology transfer for the benefit of the developing countries.

14) Such resources should be new and additional to funding already provided under other multilateral environment regimes.

Excellencies,

15) Increased action to address loss and damage is a legitimate demand of the developing countries especially those, which have emitted the least but suffered the most from climate change. No financing has been committed so far for loss and damage.

16) In this sense, we call for the provision of new financial support to developing countries to address loss and damage, in addition to adaptation and mitigation finance.

17) Furthermore, developing countries would also need financial and technical support to build the capacity for the planning and implementation of adaptation and mitigation projects, as well as to enable their access to climate finance, including concessional finance.

18) The simplification of the procedures of funding entities and mechanisms for accessing climate finance is particularly important for the poorest and most vulnerable developing countries.

Excellencies,

19) Deep and persistent imbalance in the geographic representation within the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) must be addressed and the underrepresentation of the Global South.

20) The Group believes that due regard should be paid to the principle of equitable geographical distribution in the recruitment strategy of the United Nations Environment Programme at all levels.

21) Moreover, we take note of the progress made in the development by the Board of the 10 Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns (10YFP) of a global strategy for sustainable consumption and production beyond 2022, and we highlight the importance of an inclusive and transparent process for the ongoing development of the strategy that is fully responsive to the specific challenges faced by developing countries and consistent with the 2030 Agenda and its SDGs, and invite all stakeholders of United Nation system for strengthening the implementation of the 10YFP through 2030 through enabling partnerships and commitments for action.

22) We also welcome the holding of the first “One Planet Network Forum” to promote a global and inclusive dialogue for the implementation of SDG12 and sustainable consumption and production.

Excellencies,

23) In conclusion, allow me once again to reiterate that the Group of 77 and China stresses the need to ensure adherence to the core principles of our multilateral environment agreements, such as equity and common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities.

24) The Group also believes that discussions outside the existing multilaterally agreed frameworks and conventions must not prejudge ongoing negotiations under these frameworks.

I thank you.

Madam Vice-President:

1. I have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

2. We thank the Deputy Secretary General (DSG) for her presentation on the report on the DCO and its accompanying documents, in her capacity as Co-Chair of the UNSDG.

3. We wish to take this opportunity to thank ASG Robert Piper for his work dedication, commitment, and hard work.

Madam Vice President,

4. The Group wishes to take note of all the reports, annexes and addendums prepared for our consideration during the ECOSOC-OAS session.

5. However, we would like to register our regret at the tardiness of the dissemination of these documents, which did not provide us with enough time necessary to properly review and analyse them.

6. We are hopeful that we would be provided an opportunity in the very near future to receive a presentation or briefing, so that we can properly engage on the contents of these documents.

Madam Vice President,

7. We would however like to make the following initial comments on annex 2 of the report on the RC system Results Framework:

8. First, we strongly believe that the RC system Results Framework must be responsive to the Secretary-General’s proposals for a reinvigorated RC system along with its objectives and outcomes, and should be further guided by the mandates to the system contained in the QCPR.

9. Second, the Framework should give an accounting for the estimated budget of US$281 million providing the results from all the actors who are funded through this means.

10. Third, there seems to be a conflating of the reinvigorated RC system with the UNCT and UN entities. There should be better differentiation of the results of the RCs, UNCT, DCO, etc.

11. Fourth, we note that the results framework is mainly based on perception, which is very similar to the assessment based on the data collected through questionnaire in previous years. In this regard, we reaffirm the necessity to include performance indicators in the framework, which could reflect the contribution of RC system in helping program countries to implement the 2030 Agenda.

12. The goals and targets of SDGs could work as a perfect reference. For example, in line with target 1.1, the indicator could be the reduced number of people living in extreme poverty. Also, the number of development programs conducted could also be a practical indicator.

13. Fifth, Outcome 3.3 entitled Common UN approaches are facilitated to foster agile business operations and efficiencies across the UN system, seems to be a good example where outcomes are captured in the outputs and indicators provided.

14. However, on the other hand in other areas the indicators do not seem to advance the objectives and outcomes. In addition, in 2.1.2 and 3.4, respectively, there is a great deal of cherry picking when it comes to the indicators. The focus on sustainable development and eradication of poverty as an overarching objective is obviously missing in this framework.

15. We believe the bars for the outcomes, objectives and indicators could be lifted further to more ambitious levels.

16. We expect RCs to be transparent and fully accountable to the host national government. This includes effective and timely reporting from RC and UN Country Team (UNCT) to the host government.

17. We look forward to hearing others’ views on the Results Framework during this session and we further request the opportunity to engage at a later stage.

18. Once again, many thanks for the reports and accompanying documents, and as always please note that you can count on the Group of 77 and China constructive engagement, as we try to ensure transparency and accountability of the system, which we believe can enhance opportunities to enhance investment in the system.

I thank you.

Mr. Secretary General,
Madam Vice President,

1. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

2. We thank you, Mr. Secretary-General, for the comprehensive Report on the ‘Implementation of General Assembly resolution 75/233 on the QCPR’ along with its related documents.

3. We thank as well the Deputy Secretary-General and her team, the Development Coordination Office and the Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

4. We wish to take this opportunity to thank ASG Robert Piper for his work as head of the DCO and for his dedication, commitment and hard work getting the DCO and the wider repositioned UNDS established and off to an excellent start. We wish him all the best in his new assignment and post.

Mr. Secretary General,

5. The world was already off-track to achieve the SDGs before the COVID-19 pandemic, which further exacerbated existing inequalities within and between countries.

6. More than two years on, developing countries continue to face significant obstacles in their recovery efforts, grappling with the triple crisis of recovering from the pandemic, achieving the SDGs during the remaining decade of action, and tackling climate change.

7. The repositioned UN Development System now faces the litmus test of whether it can significantly contribute to countries efforts to achieve the 2030 Agenda within the remaining decade of action.

8. The Group highlights the following elements we believe to be critical for this:

– First, the eradication of poverty in all its forms and dimensions must remain the system’s overarching objective.
– Second, development itself must remain the focus, bearing in mind the different development levels and realities on the ground in all developing countries.
– Third, national ownership and leadership in all matters pertaining to the repositioning of the UN Development System is critical for the delivery of effective results. This includes effective and timely reporting from the Resident Coordinators and UN Country Teams to host governments.
– Fourth, it is crucial that the new UN Sustainable Development Cooperation Frameworks be developed in full consultation with host governments, and are reflective of country needs and priorities.

9. In this regards, the Group is encouraged to see the positive trend in feedback that UN activities in the Cooperation Frameworks are effectively responding to national priorities and hope that this will continue to improve.

10. We also appreciate the effort to report in-depth on the groups of countries in special situations and those facing specific challenges. We hope that future reports will continue such in-depth reporting.

11. On the critical role of financing for development and funding of UN Development agencies to support efforts of developing countries in achieving the 2030 Agenda and goals of the Paris Agreement, the Group is greatly concerned about the trend of major cuts in core allocation for development.

12. In addition to the pervasive imbalance between core and non-core resources, these recent funding cuts threaten the long-term viability of the UN development pillar, as a foundation also for global peace and security.

13. While the world is experiencing immediate humanitarian urgencies, we are also on the verge of a global development crisis and these cuts in core funding of the UNDS could have a lasting effects on the most vulnerable, stall the collective development trajectories over the last decades, well-being, and security of people in the developing world -as well as on the institutions that are designed to deliver on the development aspirations.

14. In many ways, cutting funding for development is the opposite of what the world needs at a moment when recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic is urgent and we are facing global disruptions to supply chains, food insecurity, and energy insecurity in most developing regions, global price and market instability, inflationary pressures and a general decrease of global economic outputs.

15. We strongly reiterate the high level of importance programme countries accord to the core development mandate of the UN Development Agencies, in particular UNDP, in supporting countries towards the achievement of the SDGs, and we would like to stress the importance and necessity of core resources for the UNDP to deliver on its important mandates.

16. The Group notes the advancements made in the revamping of the Regional Level, including the development and roll-out of the Regional Collaborative Platforms and Issue Based Coalitions. We stress that these must proceed on a region-by-region basis and in accordance with the region’s specific needs and priorities. We also call for a strengthening of the UN Regional Commissions.

17. To conclude, the Group reaffirms its continued support for a UN Development System that would help programme countries implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and looks forward to meaningful exchanges during this Segment to better understand progress made, as well as the key challenges and gaps that still remain.

I thank you.

Mr. Chair,

1. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China on Agenda Item 138: Revised Estimates: Addressing racism and promoting dignity for all in the United Nations Secretariat.

2. Our Group would like to thank members of the Secretariat and the Advisory Committee for introducing their relevant reports.

Mr. Chair,

3. At the outset, our Group would like to condemn racism in all its forms and manifestations. We would like to highlight that the prohibition of racial discrimination is enshrined in all core international human rights instruments and the denial or violation of the principle of equal rights runs contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Mr. Chair,

4. Our Group welcomes efforts of the Secretary General to root out racism, including systemic racism within the organization. We appreciate the Secretary General’s Town Halls and engagement with staff and his concern to address this problem. However, our Group notes with concern the findings of staff survey and regret to know that staff regulations and rules can be applied unfairly on the basis of race, nationality or ethnic background.

5. Our Group has a long standing position on Equitable Geographical Distribution which is also enshrined in article 101.3 of the UN Charter, and to achieve this, we stress upon the need to address systemic racial discrimination within the UN system. We see merit in the Secretary General’s proposals and look forward to its early implementation. However, our Group also stresses upon the urgency in addressing the issue as any delay would lead to continuation of discrimination during the process of recruitment and staff promotions.

6. Finally, address the issue of racism is not only important for mandate delivery but it also sets an example for public, private, NGOs and other entities to deal with the menace of this problem that we face.

I thank you Mr. Chair

Mr. Chair,

The Under Secretary General of Global Communications,
Distinguished delegates

1. I am honored to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China at the closing of 44th Session of Committee on Information this year.

2. The Group 77 and China welcomes the adoption of the G77 proposed resolution by Consensus.

3. Allow me to congratulate our distinguished delegates, and representatives of groups, for reaching a consensus on this year’s resolution. We thank them for their constructive engagement with the G77 and China with a sense of responsibility to ensure a smooth and a successful outcome of the Session.

4. I thank the Department of Global Communications, all the members of CoI Secretariat, and also the members of G77 and China Secretariat for providing an enabling environment and excellent support during the course of this session.

5. Group of 77 and China’s objective through the adoption of the resolution was to ensure renewed momentum and support for the Department of Global Communications and the work of the United Nations, and we believe we have made an important progress in this regard.

Mr. Chair,

6. On this occasion, the Group 77 and China would also like to draw attention to a recent incident, which is a matter of grave concern:

7. Bearing in mind that impunity for attacks against journalists remains one of the greatest challenges to the safety of journalists and that ensuring accountability for crimes committed against journalists is a key element in preventing future attacks, we condemn the recent shocking killing of Palestinian- American Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh.

8. We send our condolences to her family; to the Palestinian people; to the Al Jazeera team; and to the international media community.

9. We call for an immediate, international, impartial, independent, and effective investigation into her killing, and stress the need for accountability.

10. I thank you.

Mr. Chair,

1. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China on Agenda Item 150: Administrative and Budgetary Aspects of financing of the UN Peacekeeping Operations concerning the UN Logistics Base and Regional Service Centre Entebbe.

2. On behalf of the Group, I would like to thank the members of the Secretariat and Vice-Chair of the Advisory Committee for introducing their respective reports.

Mr. Chair,

3. I first begin with the UN Logistics Base at Brindisi, Italy that has been operational since 1994 and functioning as a unified entity comprising the Global Service Centre in Brindisi and the UN ICT facility in Valencia, both of which provide the required support services throughout the lifecycle of field missions from beginning till end.

4. We note the proposed change in nomenclature of UNLB and recall that there have been attempts in the past to change this nomenclature which was not approved by the General Assembly. We would like to highlight that the core function of the UNLB remains the provision of logistics support and ICT services to the UN Peacekeeping Operations. In this context, our Group concurs with the recommendation of the ACABQ report against the proposal to use the nomenclature of “United Nations Global Service Centre” and referring to the same report, I quote that “the proposed change in nomenclature has a broader implication on the work of the Organization, including in relation to the concept of a global service delivery model”

5. Our Group notes the increasing presence of the UN System in Valencia in the Secretary General’s report, including on the proposed re-deployments and we will critically analyze these developments during the informal consultations.

Mr. Chair,

6. The Group recalls that the GA in its resolution 70/286 paragraph 66 had requested the Secretary-General to develop a scalability model for the United Nations Logistics Base. The Group further recalls that the GA has requested the Secretary-General to develop a clear definition of scalability, identify the activities that are scalable and ensure consistency in the application of this model as well as to ensure that they take into account, inter alia, workload factors and efficiency gains. We note the efforts to refine the scalability model for the UNLB so far and will be interested in discussing the progress on the refinement of this scalability model for UNLB during our informal meetings.

7. We note that the report of the Secretary-General on the revised concept of Strategic Deployment Solutions has been submitted as an annex to the UNLB report. However, our Group would like to have a standalone report on Strategic Deployment Solutions submitted by the Secretary-General for consideration by the GA and not as an annex to the UNLB report.

Mr. Chair,

8. I now turn to the second part of my statement regarding the Regional Service Centre Entebbe at Uganda. On behalf of our Group, I would like to extend our appreciation to the administration and staff of the Regional Service Centre in Entebbe for the warm reception accorded to the Fifth Committee members during their field trip last month which afforded us an opportunity to get first-hand experience and information on the operations of the center.

9. Our Group wishes to recall that the GA resolution 64/269 established the Regional Service Center in Entebbe in July 2010 as the first Shared Service Center for Missions in the region under the Global Field Support Strategy and the GA, in its resolution 69/307, gave the Center operational and managerial independence and requested the Secretary-General to submit a budget proposal to be charged against the Missions that the center supports.

10. The Group wishes to appreciate the critical work performed by the Center in supporting (seven) 7 Peacekeeping Missions and support offices and (nine) 9 Special Political Missions, as well as other Missions in the region, including residual liquidation functions to the closing and closed peacekeeping Missions. The Group notes that the Center will provide support to over 77% of the UN field operations globally and serve over 16,400 personnel, including international and national staff as well as uniformed personnel.

11. As the Group has observed previously, the workload and volume of transactions carried out by the Centre have increased significantly and it is imperative that adequate resources which are commensurate with this increasing workload and responsibility are provided to the Centre to enable it to fulfil its mandate successfully.

12. The Group appreciates the efforts made by the Centre in developing and refining its scalability model that informs the administrative and budgetary requirements and we look forward to understanding more on this concept during informal consultations together with the possibility of extending such a scalability model to other support Centers.

Mr. Chair,

13. The Group notes the Centre’s efforts towards putting in place the measures required for consideration of General Service staff for continuing appointments when they become eligible. The Group recalls that the GA, in its resolution 72/286, requested the Secretary-General to ensure that national staff of the Centre are granted continuing contracts in line with relevant provisions of GA resolutions. The Group therefore urges the Secretary-General to facilitate the issuance of continuing contracts for national staff that meet the eligibility requirements in compliance with UN Staff Rules and Regulations.

14. The Group notes with concern that a total of forty-eight (48) posts were vacant as of 23 March 2022. The Group reiterates that the Centre should be adequately staffed and provided with adequate resources to ensure effective implementation of its mandate and emphasizes on the need for filling the vacant posts as expeditiously as possible.

15. On behalf of the Group, I assure you of our commitment to engage constructively on these important matters during the course of our discussions this session.

I thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Chair,

1. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China on Agenda Item 138: Proposed Programme Budget 2022, PBI for Marine Bio Diversity on the General Assembly draft decision A/76/L.46.

2. Our Group would like to thank the Secretariat for the presentation of the programme budget implications for the fifth session of the intergovernmental conference on an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ) in August 2022. We also thank the Chair of the Advisory Committee, for introducing the Committee’s related report.

Mr. Chair,

3. We fully recognize the need for protecting the oceans for the benefit of our future generations. We also recognize the importance of our oceans and the benefits of their contents to mankind, which makes their conservation and sustainable use a shared responsibility and desired objective. Our group also emphasizes that access to marine resources should be in a fair and equitable manner.

4. Our Group is fully committed to take the BBNJ negotiations forward, and join hands to work towards a treaty that takes into account our shared goals and values. We look forward to the convening of the fifth session of the intergovernmental conference on BBNJ in August 2022, with adequate allocation of resources for support services during the session to ensure that it is a success. We also wish to underscore the importance of having sufficient resources to support the participation of our experts from respective capitals for the upcoming negotiations to make the process more effective.

Mr. Chair,

5. Our Group is committed to working constructively with all delegations on this important agenda item. We stand ready to engage constructively with a spirit of flexibility to arrive at consensus in a timely fashion and to conclude this item.

I thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Chair,

1. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China on Agenda Item 140: Improving the financial situation of the United Nations.

2. Our Group would like to thank the Secretariat for the presentation of Addendum 1 to the Report of the Secretary General on this very important item that relates to the financial health of this Organization. The Group also expresses its appreciation to the Office of Contributions for the updated information on the assessments of Member States, and its continued support to Member States, in these very difficult times.

Mr. Chair,

3. We are seriously concerned at the continuing liquidity crisis of the organization with no sustainable end in sight. It is quite evident that the current situation if allowed to persist would seriously be affecting the ability of this organization to function effectively.

4. As noted in the Addendum report, the unpaid assessed contributions as at 30 April 2022 were $154 million more than as at 30 April 2021, indicating a problematic trend in payments for regular budget.

5. Similarly, for peacekeeping operations, the level of unpaid assessments as at 30 April 2022 was $2.8 billion, which is $341 million more than that last year on 30 April 2021.

Mr. Chair,

6. Our Group would like to highlight the importance of payments of assessed contributions by member states as key to addressing the current challenges being faced by the organization in terms of financial health. Of particular emphasis are those member states with the highest arrears that have seriously impacted the organization’s financial situation. We reiterate the need for all Member States to pay in full, on time and without conditions.

7. Despite bearing an ever-increasing share of the financial burden of the Organization, the Group remains committed to participate constructively in any efforts towards resolving the financial difficulties of the Organization.

I thank you, Mr. Chair.

General Comments

Distinguished Co-Facilitators,

1) I have the honor to deliver these remarks on the behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

2) At the outset, let me thank the co-facilitators for their efforts in preparing the First Rev. We note that some of the Groups inputs were taken on board, whilst some others we deem critical to this process were not taken on board.

3) However, considering the length of the document and the inclusion of new language in it, the Group believes that more time was required before these consultations in order to engage comprehensively with the text.

4) The Group would reiterate our previous request that delegations be provided more time to engage with the process and with each other going forward in order to ensure that we reach a consensus text.

5) Keeping the above in mind, the Group will only be providing its preliminary comments on the paragraphs today and not our final, detailed proposals. Our detailed proposals on the text will be provided in our subsequent written inputs.

6) Generally on the first Rev, the Group would again highlight the need to adhere to terminologies from multilaterally agreed UN documents, such as the 2030 Agenda, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, the Paris Agreement under UNFCCC, and other major UN outcome documents in the economic, social and environmental fields throughout this text.

7) The Group also requests for clarity on the rationale for inclusion of Alt and Bis, Ter and Quat Paragraphs in the document.

Section I Introduction (Para 1-11)

Co-Facilitators,

8) On Para 2, the Group notes that some of our inputs have been taken on board. We would reiterate our request to include a reference to ‘leave no country behind’ and to ‘build a better future for all’.

9) On Para 3, the Group notes that our input for the inclusion of a reference to the Declaration on the Right to Development has not been included. We would highlight that currently Para 3 as it stands is verbatim Para 10 of the 2030 Agenda, without the inclusion of the reference to the Right to Development and reiterate our request for its inclusion.

10) Furthermore, the Group had proposed an additional paragraph elaborating on the right to development in our inputs and would reiterate our request for its inclusion.

11) On Para 4, we note that our proposal for placing the reference to the eradication of extreme poverty higher in the text has been partially taken on board and propose that it may be moved further up as Para 2 bis. We also reiterate that we should ‘remain gravely concerned’ on the increase in the global poverty rate rather than the current language which states ‘note with concern’.

12) On Paragraph 7, we note that the Groups proposal for inclusion of the UNFCC and the New Urban Agenda has not been taken on board and reiterate our request for their inclusion. We also propose the inclusion of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

13) On Paragraph 8, the group reiterates its request to remove the reference to the ‘triple planetary crises’. We also reiterate our proposal for the inclusion of a reference to desertification. Additional comments will be in our written inputs.

14) On Paragraph 9, the group would request for a Source for the language. The Group would also highlight that this Paragraph is duplicative of Paragraph 40 and would be proposing some streamlining in our written inputs.

15) On Paragraph 11 regarding the listing, the Group requests for the inclusion of a reference to ‘the specific challenges facing the Middle Income Countries’ and ‘countries and people under foreign occupation’, as also requested in our written inputs.

16) We note that our previous proposal for moving the reference to ‘removing the obstacles to the full realization of the right to self-determination of peoples living under colonial and foreign occupation’ to the Introduction Section as well as our proposal for moving the Paragraph on ‘reaffirming in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, the need to respect the territorial integrity and political independence of States’ have not been taken on board.

17) In this regard, the Group proposes the addition of Agreed language from last year’s Ministerial Declaration, specifically Paragraphs 29 and Paragraph 30 into the Introduction Section. The Group stresses it would not be able to accept the removal of language verbatim from the 2030 Agenda.

18) Moreover, we also note that our request for the inclusion of language on unilateral, economic, financial or trade measures, not in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations that impede the full achievement of economic and social development, particularly in developing countries has not been included. We reiterate our request for this inclusion, highlighting that this is language verbatim from the 2030 Agenda.

Section II Impact of COVID-19 (Para 12-33)

19) On paragraph 12, we propose the deletion of the reference to people in vulnerable situations in the fourth line. We also propose changing ‘the elderly’ to ‘older persons’.

20) On paragraph 13, the group proposes the addition of resilient infrastructure, sustainable industrialization and innovation. The group also proposes removal of ‘eliminating’ before poverty, a reference to food insecurity and malnutrition rather than food security and a reference to climate change rather than only climate.

21) On paragraph 14, we propose the addition of the General Assembly before EOSOC.

22) On Paragraph 15, we note that the previous placeholder on Employment and Social Protection has been removed and that proposed language in our written inputs on Social Protection has not been included. We believe that the COVID-19 crisis has demonstrated the importance of Social Protection systems and reiterate our request for the inclusion of our proposal on it.

23) On Paragraph 16, we propose the inclusion of plants as the One Health approach strengthens synergies between the health of people, animals, plants and ecosystems. We will also be providing inputs for additional changes to the language in our written inputs.

24) On Paragraph 17, we propose the inclusion of evidence before science based in the first line. Our final inputs on this paragraph will be provided in our written inputs.

25) On Paragraph 18 we propose the inclusion of a reference to scaling up local and regional manufacturing and distribution capabilities.

26) On Paragraph 19, the Group proposes additional language on aiding developing in their efforts to meet national immunization requirements, improve national health systems and health infrastructure, and strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, with a view to achieving universal health coverage.

27) On Paragraph 20bis, the Group will propose an Alt paragraph in our written inputs.

28) The Group also reiterates our request for the inclusion of an additional paragraph on the New Urban Agenda, as previously proposed in our previous inputs. We propose that it may be placed as 20 bis ter.

29) On paragraph 21, we propose the addition of volunteers ahead of frontline workers.

30) On Paragraph 22, the Group has the following remarks:

o On Paragraph 22 (b) the Group proposes the addition of socio-economic impacts.
o On Paragraph 22 (c), the Group proposes alternative language with regards to TRIPs flexibilities, based on UNGA resolution 76/257 highlighting the right to use, to the fullest extent, the provision contained in the WTO TRIPS Agreement and the WTO Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.
o On Paragraph 22 (f), the Group proposes replacing primary health systems with primary healthcare. Our additional inputs on this paragraph will be in our written inputs.

31) The Group reiterates the request for inclusion of language related to migrants. We propose it be included as Para 22 bis and our detailed language proposal will be in our written inputs.

32) On Paragraph 23 we propose the inclusion of a reference to ‘increase in food prices’ after global value and supply chains.

33) On Paragraph 24, we note that our inputs have been partly incorporated. However, we reiterate the Groups preference for the language previously provided in our written inputs and will be proposing an Alt in our written submission.

34) The Group had also proposed the inclusion of a reference to Foreign Direct Investment in our written inputs. Keeping in mind the importance of FDI and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on FDI flows, we request for its inclusion as a Para 27 bis. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

Section III Goals under in depth Review and VNRs (Para 28-30 bis)

35) Generally, on this section, the Group emphasizes that all of the SDGs under in depth review are equally important.

36) On Paragraph 28, the Group requests the inclusion of a reference appreciating the Group of Friends of the VNRs.

37) On Paragraph 29, the Group will provide its proposal in our written inputs.

SDG 4 (Para 31 – 49)

38) The Group proposes a chapeau Paragraph as 31-pre reaffirming our commitment to SDG 4. We will also be proposing such a chapeau paragraph on all the SDGs under in-depth review. Our detailed proposal will be on our written inputs.

39) On Para 31, the Group proposes the inclusion of a reference to ‘the gender digital divide’ after digital divides.

40) On Paragraph 32, the Group proposes changing inequality to inequalities.

41) On Paragraph 33, the Group proposes adding non-discriminatory before integrated and deletion of the last line ‘and without any discrimination’.

42) On Paragraph 34, we request for a source for the language. We also propose changing ‘call for scaling up’ to ‘aim to scale up’, the addition of ‘access to’ before quality education and the addition of children and youth living in rural and remote areas.

43) On Paragraph 35, the Group requests for source for the language in the first two sentences of the paragraph. We also propose the inclusion of stronger language on financing for education and closing the widening gap between resources and requirements in developing countries. Our complete detailed proposals on this Paragraph will be provided in our written inputs.

44) On Paragraph 36, the Group proposes a reference to children living in extreme poverty. The Group requests for a Source on the reference to committing to 12 years of quality education for all girls. Additional proposals on this paragraph will be provided in our written inputs.

45) On Paragraph 38, the Group proposes the inclusion of a reference to the importance of the Transforming Education being inclusive and country led. Additional language with regards Paragraph 38 will be provided in our written inputs.

46) On the first line of Paragraph 38 bis, the Group proposes that it may be changed to ‘We call on Member States in collaboration with other key education stakeholders’. Additional comments on Paragraph 38 bis will be provided in our written inputs.

SDG 5 (Para 40-51)

47) In line with our previous comments, the Group proposes that this Section start with a chapeau Paragraph reaffirming our commitment to SDG 5. Hence, we propose that Paragraph 40 be split up into 40 and 40 bis. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

48) On Paragraphs 41, the Group requests for its source. The Group will provide its position on this Paragraph in our written inputs.

49) On Paragraph 42, the Group will provide its position on this Paragraph in our written inputs.

50) On Paragraph 44, the Group will provide its position in our written inputs.

51) On Paragraph 45, the Group will provide its position in our written inputs.

52) On Paragraph 46, the Group requests for the source of the language. The Group will provide its position in our written inputs.

53) On Paragraph 47, the Group will provide its position in our written inputs.

54) On Paragraph 48, the group proposes the inclusion of a reference to eradication of poverty in all its forms and dimensions. We also propose the inclusion of a reference to recognizing the importance of ensuring women’s access to and ownership of natural and economic resources, including land and water and access to financial services. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

55) On Paragraph 51, the Group will provide its position in our written inputs.

SDG 14 (Para 52-65)

56) On Paragraph 53, the Group proposes chancing precautionary principle to precautionary approach. We also propose changing ‘preserve’ to ‘conserve’. We propose the addition of language on ‘in light of national circumstances, needs and priorities’.

57) On Paragraph 54, we propose the addition of a sentence ‘as recalled in Paragraph 158 of the Future We Want’.

58) On Paragraph 55, we propose the addition of language on the decline of coral reefs. Our additional comments on this Paragraph will be provided in our written inputs.

59) On Paragraph 57, we propose the addition of ‘including by setting new timelines, taking into account unique circumstances’ in the last line. Our final proposal will be in our written inputs.

60) On Paragraph 60, the Group proposes the deletion of the reference to climate change mitigation strategies. We also propose the inclusion of a reference to ‘environmentally sound waste management’. The Group will also propose additional proposals in our written inputs.

61) On Paragraph 62, the Group proposes the deletion of the reference of the Fifth IGN being the ‘final’ IGN. We will also propose additional language in our written inputs.

62) On Paragraph 63, the Group will be proposing language in our written inputs.

63) On Paragraph 63bis, the Group proposes the deletion of the reference to the Ocean Climate nexus.

64) On Paragraph 63ter, the Group will be proposing additional language on small scale aquatic producers and the need to increase support to sustainable small-scale fisheries. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs

65) On Paragraph 63quat, the group reiterates the request for the inclusion of our proposal on additional language in this paragraph on the urgency to protect, restore and sustainably manage aquatic ecosystems, including through nature-based solutions ,ecosystem-based approaches, among other approaches, in integrated coastal zone management to prevent pollution at its source, reduce the risk, impacts, and costs of disasters, and build adaptive capacity and resilience to advance the full implementation of the 2030 Agenda.

66) On Paragraph 64 we propose the addition of reference to UNEA 5.2

SDG 15 (Para 66-80)

67) The Group proposes an addition of ‘our prosperity and planet’ to the end of Paragraph 66.

68) On Paragraph 69, the Group will provide its comments in our written inputs.

69) On Paragraph 70, the Group proposes the addition of a reference to the impacts of deforestation, desertification and drought being felt most strongly by developing countries.

70) On paragraph 71, we propose the deletion of the second sentence in the paragraph.

71) On Paragraph 72, the Group proposes additional language on soft and hard limits on adaptation. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

72) On Paragraph 73, our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

73) On Paragraph 74, the Group proposes the deletion of the word practicality.

74) On Paragraph 75, the Group proposes that we welcome the convening of the First Part of COP 15 and take note with appreciation of the Kunming Declaration. We will also propose additional language in our written inputs. (G77 and China Written Inputs to the Zero Draft, Para 83 bis)

75) On Paragraphs 80 and 80 Alt, the Group expresses its strong preference for the language contained in 80 Alt and would like to see its retention in the second Rev as it comprehensively addresses the need for provision of means of implementation to developing countries.

SDG 17 (Para 81-92)

76) On Paragraph 81, the Group proposes that it may be split up into two, in line with our comments on previous SDGs.

77) The Group proposes an additional Paragraph, 82 bis, on the urgent need to develop measurements of progress on sustainable development that complement or go beyond GDP in order to have a more inclusive and holistic approach reflecting all kinds of vulnerabilities and to inform access to international cooperation and concessional finance.

78) On Paragraph 83, the Group will provide additional language in our written inputs.

79) On Paragraph 84, the Group will provide its proposal in our written input.

80) On Paragraph 86, the Group proposes the addition of reference to increased inequality and digital gaps.

81) On Paragraph 87, the Group proposes the inclusion of language on South-South Cooperation as a complement to and not a substitute for North-South Cooperation, in line with previous agreed language. We also reiterate our proposal for the inclusion of additional language on inviting all relevant stakeholders to share their knowledge and experience, particularly homegrown development approaches, as well as good practices, in order to intensify efforts towards the eradication of poverty. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

82) On Paragraph 89, the Group had proposed its deletion in our original inputs and reiterates that request. We will be providing an Alt Paragraph in our written inputs on the need for development partners to scale up and fulfill their ODA commitments to achieve the target of 0.7 per cent of gross national income for official development assistance (ODA/GNI) and 0.15 to 0.20 per cent of ODA/GNI to the least developed countries.

83) On Paragraph 90, the Group will provide additions in our written inputs, including the inclusion of a reference to food security and nutrition.

84) We will also propose an additional paragraph on the importance of taking targeted measures to eradicate poverty in all its forms and dimensions everywhere, including extreme poverty, with enhanced international support and strengthened global partnerships in our written inputs

85) On Paragraph 92, we propose that financial inclusion is a tool for not only reducing poverty, but also ending hunger, protecting human health and promoting sustainable deve3lopment and will propose language in our written inputs.

86) We will also reiterate our proposal for the inclusion of a reference to the role of MSMEs in contributing to SDG implementation. We propose that it may be included as 92bis.

Other Priority Issues

87) On Paragraph 94, the Group requests for the source of the language in the paragraph. Our position will be provided in our written inputs.

88) On Paragraph 95, the Group proposes that the paragraph be split into two and will be proposing some additional language in this paragraph. We reiterate the proposal from our written input to move the reference to the Glasgow Climate Pact above, where there is a reference to implementing the outcomes of COP 26. We will also be providing additional inputs on this paragraph, including on the first sentence, in our written inputs.

89) On Paragraph 96 and 96 Alt, the Group expresses its strong preference for Paragraph 96 and would like to see its retention. We also propose the inclusion of a reference to the need for developed countries Parties to at least double their collective provision of climate finance for adaptation to developing country Parties from 2019 levels by 2025. We also propose to change ‘by 2024’ to ‘prior to 2025’.

90) On Paragraph 97, the Group proposes the inclusion of a reference to ‘climate change objectives’ rather than only ‘climate objectives’.

91) On Paragraph 98, the Group will provide its proposals in our written inputs:

92) On Paragraph 99, the Group will provide its proposals in our written inputs

93) On Paragraph 100, we propose that it may be moved up as 89 bis.

94) On Paragraph 102, the Group will provide its position in our written inputs.

95) On Paragraph 104, the Group will provide its proposal in our written inputs.

96) On Paragraph 105, the Group reiterates our proposal to take note of rather than welcome the Youth 2030 strategy. The Group also proposes the addition of ‘as appropriate’ after system wide implementation. Additional proposals on this paragraph will be provided in our written inputs.

97) On Paragraph 106, we propose that the paragraph stop at children affected by armed conflict and propose the deletion of the remaining paragraph.

98) On Paragraph 108, we propose to change ‘reformed’ to ‘repositioned’. Our complete proposals will be in our written inputs.

Our Roadmap for the Way Forward (Para 109-135)

99) On Paragraph 109, we propose the deletion of the reference to triple planetary crisis and instead propose a reference to the crises of climate change, desertification, biodiversity loss and pollution.

100) On Para 110, we reiterate our proposal to take note of rather than welcome the Our Common Agenda report rather than welcome it. We also reiterate our proposal to refer to it as a proposed vision rather than a concrete vision. The final position and proposals of the Group on this paragraph, including on the reference to the biennial summit will be in our written inputs.

101) On Paragraph 11, we propose to change vision and goals to implementation of the 2030 Agenda and the achievements of its SDGs.

102) On Paragraph 113, we propose changing climate and environment responsive to sustainable and responsive approach. We also propose the inclusion of a reference to countries unique national circumstances. The final proposal of the group will be in our written inputs.

103) On Paragraph 114, we propose the following:

o On the Chapeau of the paragraph, we will provide our proposals in our written inputs.
o On 114 a, we propose that it may read ‘in line with Paris Agreement and other relevant decisions, including the Glasgow Climate Pact’.
o On 114 b, we reiterate our original proposal to stop at prevent exploitation.
o On 114 d, we propose the inclusion of a reference to global efforts in addition to national and regional. We also propose the inclusion of language on increasing funding for financial and technical cooperation to combat litter before it reaches terrestrial and marine environments.
o Our position on 114 f will be in our written inputs.
o We also propose the inclusion of a reference to strengthening the role of UNEP. Our detailed proposal will be in our written input.

104) We propose the addition of an additional paragraph as 116 pre on the importance of investment in quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure for both COVID-19 recovery and the achievement of sustainable development in its economic, social and environmental dimensions. G77 and China Written Inputs to the Zero Draft, Para 121 bis)

105) On Paragraph 117, we reiterate our proposal for a reference to the voluntary channeling of at least 250 billion SDRs to all developing countries in need. We also reiterate our proposal for the deletion of the world ‘vulnerable’ before middle-income countries.

106) On Paragraph 118, we will propose the inclusion of a reference to the Un Food Systems Coordination Hub as well as to the Stock-Taking moment in 2023. Our detailed proposal will be in our written inputs.

107) On Paragraph 119, we propose the inclusion of a reference to the establishment of the African Continental Free Trade Area as also proposed in our previous inputs. We will also propose additional language on food security and nutrition, reduce food loss and waste and promote a more efficient, inclusive, resilient and sustainable agriculture and food systems in our written inputs.

108) The Group also reiterates our proposal for the addition of a paragraph on the need for enhanced representation and voice for developing countries in decision-making in global international economic and financial institutions.

109) On Paragraph 121, we request for the Source of the language in the paragraph. The Groups inputs on this will be in our written inputs.

110) On Paragraph 122, the position of the Group will be in our written inputs.

111) On Paragraphs 123 and 123 Alt, the Group expresses its strong preference for Paragraph 123 and proposes that it be moved up to the Introduction Section as highlighted in our previous intervention for the Introduction Section.

112) On Paragraph 125, the Group will provide its proposals in our written inputs

113) On Paragraph 127, the Group requests for its Source.

114) On Paragraph 129, we will propose additional language in our written inputs on the decision to be taken on the organizational aspects.

115) On Paragraph 132, the Group will provide final proposal in our written inputs.

116) On Paragraph 133, the Group will provide slight amendments in our written inputs.

117) In conclusion, the interventions today are not the final inputs of the Group on the First Rev and our final detailed proposals will be provided in our writt